Comments on June's list
The book that I would like the most to discuss, except for the fact that no one I know has read it, is Herman & Weiner's The Year 2000: A Framework for Speculation on the Next Thirty-Three Years. The book is not a bunch of pie-in-the-sky pronouncements, but a sober attempt to make plausible predictions and draw up likely scenarios for the future. I compared their population projections with a 2001 almanac, and they did pretty well there. The two biggest mistakes they make are 1. overestimating the perdurance of communism and 2. believing that the economy in 2000 will be super-awesome, with everyone working four days a week or fewer, and consequent expanded leisure time. (Obviously they could not predict AIDS, but they do mention pandemics as the kind of thing that could throw all their calculations off.) The also underestimate the importance of Islam and (although they constantly stress that they are underestimating the importance of computers) the importance of computers, or at least they fail to see what computers will be used for in the year 2000 (pornography).
Basically, I want someone who knows something about the world (which I do not) to read this book and tell me what they got wrong.
Briefly, I should mention the Two Spanish Picaresque Novels (listed separately but published together by Penguin), because they are hilarious, and involve amoral rogues pulling tricks and cutting capers--which I guess I knew is what a picaresque is going to be about anyway, but I was not prepared for the extent of the amorality or the scatological excesses of some of the tricks. Anyone who plays a rogue should probably read these books for ideas.
And Tom Brown's Schooldays is an interesting (once it gets rolling, which takes like 75 very dry pages) depiction of an utterly alien educational experience. On the one hand, believing that rugby games for the honor of the "house" are an opportunity for "manly" "heroics" (as Hughes clearly does) is obviously a joke, and any system in which the exploitation of smaller boys by larger is in fact officially institutionalized as well as tacitly condoned sounds horrific. On the other hand, a school that offers some degree of autonomy and privacy to the students, that takes education seriously, that teaches "to the young boy, for the first time, the meaning of his life--that it was no fool's or sluggard's paradise into which he had wandered by chance, but a battlefield ordained from of old, where there are no spectators, but the youngest must take his side, and the stakes are life and death"--well, I did say it was utterly alien.
Also, I've never see the word "fag" appear so often in any other book I've ever read, and this is at times hilarious (as are certain other words Hughes employs in all innocence. "Constant intercourse with Arthur has done much for both of them...").